Performance Analysis of Capacitor Configurations in Synchronous Reluctance Generators for Wind Applications | IJEEE Volume 9 – Issue 4 | IJEEE-V9I4P1
International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Ethics
ISSN: 2456-9771 | Peer‑Reviewed Open Access Journal
Volume 9, Issue 4
|
Published:
Author
Dr. Hachimenum N. Amadi, Dr. Otonye E. Ojuka, Eberechukwu Onuedem
Abstract
This study examines the optimization of synchronous reluctance generators (SynRGs) for wind energy conversion systems (WECS), focusing on the comparative performance of series and parallel capacitor connections. The purpose is to address persistent challenges in voltage regulation, reactive power compensation, and energy efficiency that limit SynRG adoption in renewable energy applications. Existing systems frequently experience poor voltage regulation, reaching up to 12.8% under series compensation, and suboptimal efficiency of only 88.3% at full load. To resolve these issues, the research employs d–q axis modeling, transient analysis, and multi-objective optimization using the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). Simulation and analytical results reveal that parallel capacitor configurations significantly outperform series arrangements, improving voltage regulation by 8.1 percentage points (reduced to 4.7% at 100A load) and increasing efficiency by 2.6 percentage points (achieving 90.9% at full load). Reactive power analysis shows that series capacitors provide a variable output up to 63.7 kVAR at 100A, while parallel capacitors deliver a stable 15.1 kVAR, with crossover occurring at 38.6A. The optimal sizing of capacitors is determined as 21.2 μF/kVAR, with a 100 μF capacitor yielding 30.2 kVAR of compensation. Based on these findings, three policy guidelines are proposed: (1) prioritize parallel capacitor configurations for applications requiring <5% voltage regulation and >90% efficiency, (2) adopt series compensation selectively for heavy inductive loads exceeding 40A where reactive power demand surpasses 15 kVAR, and (3) apply the 21.2 μF/kVAR rule for capacitor sizing to balance performance and cost-effectiveness. These results provide practical insights for engineers and policymakers aiming to enhance the reliability, efficiency, and sustainability of wind energy systems using SynRG technology.
Keywords
SynRGs, Capacitance, Series, Parallel, GeneratorsConclusion
This study set out to understand how capacitor configurations influence the performance of synchronous reluctance generators in wind energy systems, and the findings clearly highlight the importance of choosing the right approach. The results show that parallel capacitors consistently deliver better voltage stability and efficiency, cutting regulation down to just 4.7% and pushing efficiency above 90%. This makes them highly suitable for applications where stable and efficient power delivery is crucial. On the other hand, while series capacitors showed weaker voltage regulation and slightly higher losses, they proved valuable when the demand for reactive power is heavy, supplying up to 63.7 kVAR at high current levels.
The research also established a practical guideline for capacitor sizing, identifying 21.2 ÎĽF/kVAR as an optimal benchmark. This not only ensures reliable compensation but also avoids unnecessary costs from oversizing. Together, these insights point to a balanced strategy: prioritize parallel connections for general efficiency and stability, while reserving series configurations for specific heavy-load scenarios.
In essence, this work underscores that capacitor choice is not one-size-fits-all but depends on the operational needs of the wind energy system. By aligning technical performance with cost-effectiveness, the study provides a pathway toward more reliable, sustainable, and adaptable renewable energy generation.
References
Beainy, A., Maatouk, C., Moubayed, N., & Kaddah, F. (2016). Comparison of different types of generator for wind energy conversion system topologies. In Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Renewable Energies for Developing Countries (REDEC), Zouk Mosbeh, Lebanon, 13–15 July 2016.Â
Cozzi, L., Gould, T., Bouckart, S., Crow, D., & Wetzel, D. (2020). World Energy Outlook 2020. International Energy Agency (IEA). https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020
Durakovic, J. (2021). Capacitor applications in electrical energy systems. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 72(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.2478/jee-2021-0034
Gao, X., & Liu, Y. (2021). Reactive power and voltage regulation of synchronous reluctance generators in wind energy systems. Renewable Energy Research, 14(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.05.014
Gao, Z., & Liu, X. (2021). An overview on fault diagnosis, prognosis and resilient control for wind turbine systems. Processes, 9, 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9030300Â
Global Wind Energy Council. (2017). Global Wind Report 2017. GWEC. https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2017/
He, J., & Zhuo, F. (2017). Dynamic modeling and simulation of synchronous reluctance generators with capacitive compensation in wind applications. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 87, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.11.019
Maraaba, L. S., Al-Hamouz, Z. M., Milhem, A. S., & Twaha, S. (2021). Comprehensive parameters identification and dynamic model validation of interior-mount line-start permanent magnet synchronous motors. Energies, 14(18), 5809. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185809
Maroufian, S. S., & Pillay, P. (2018). Self-excitation criteria of the synchronous reluctance generator in stand-alone mode of operation. IEEE Transactions on IndustrialÂ
Nikkila, A.-J., Kuusela, A., Laasonen, M., Haarla, L., & Pahkin, A. (2019). Self-excitation of a synchronous generator during power system restoration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34(5), 3902–3911. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2916378Â
Novaes Menezes, E. J., AraĂşjo, A. M., & Bouchonneau da Silva, N. S. (2018). A review on wind turbine control and its associated methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 945–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.280Â
Painuly, J. P., & Wohlgemuth, N. (2021). Renewable energy technologies: Barriers and policy implications. In J. Ren (Ed.), Renewable-energy-driven future (pp. 539–562). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819445-7.00018-2Â
Pizarro, J., Orellana, A., Tapia, J. A., & Riquelme, M. (2021). Synchronous reluctance machines for wind energy conversion systems: A review. Energies, 14(4), 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041032
Rebahi, F., Bentounsi, A., Khelifa, H., Boulkhrachef, O., & Meherhera, D. (2019). Comparative study of a self-excited induction and synchronous reluctance generators capabilities. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE), Algiers, Algeria, 19–21 November 2019 (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Â
Shourangiz-Haghighi, A., Diaz, M., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Yuan, Y., Faraji, R., Ding, L., & Guerrero, J. M. (2020). Developing more efficient wind turbines: A survey of control challenges and opportunities. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 14, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2020.2995365Â